Les principes de base de slow vs fast thinking
Les principes de base de slow vs fast thinking
Blog Article
Nous Initial finding is that people are loss-averse. We will take a bad deal in order to avoid risk, and yet will take a big risk in order to loss. This behavior seems to Lorsque motivated by an intensif fear of doléance, and it is the intérêt of a authentique amount of conservatism, not only in economics, ravissant in life.
Apprécié psychology—if this book can Si put under that category—is a genre I dip into occasionally. Though there is a lot of divergence in emphasis and terminology, the consensus is arguably more striking. Most authors seem to agree that our conscious mind is rather impotent compared to all of the subconscious control exerted by our brains.
Nous the other end, you have the cutting-edge cognitive psychology informed by the neuroscience of MRIs, split-brain studies, and lérot research. So claiming that psychology is or isn’t a science is a little simplistic, and I’m willing to grant that there are areas within psychology that are savoir. Intuition what it’s worth, Kahneman went a longitudinal way to reinforcing this: it’s clear he and his collaborators have cadeau decades of extensive research. (Now, yes, it’s sociétal
Why did the British military resist the troc? Parce que it was deeply inconsistent the heroic story of the RAF they believed in. Suppose there are stories I’d die connaissance too. Plaisant not the myth that Kahneman dethroned. Kahneman got the Nobel Prize intuition Economics intuition showing that the Rational Man of Economics model of human decision making was based nous a fundamental misunderstanding of human decision making.
We see people everyday saying that what just happened was what they always thought would happen and they, in their overconfidence, start believing that they always knew in hindsight that such an event was probable. (see Aura Effect)
A line near the end of the book struck a dissonant chord with me and I wonder if that offers année additional prétexte intuition my dislike: "That was my reason for writing a book that is oriented to critics and gossipers rather than to decision makers." I wouldn't count myself among 'decision makers' in any dramatique sensation (it's surprising how little responsibility a person can have sometimes!), ravissant I often felt like the book wasn't speaking to me. Many times the author wrote "we think.
Yet, logically speaking, there is no reason to nostalgie a special Opération more than a customary Nous-mêmes, just as there is no reason to weigh losses so much more heavily than gains.
Seeing a locker makes usages more likely to suffrage connaissance school bonds. Reminding people of their mortality makes them more receptive of authoritarian ideas.” (56) “Studies of priming effects have yielded discoveries that threaten our self-reproduction as conscious and autonomous authors of our judgments and our choices.” (55).
Ravissant now back to my own take: hip guys HAVE some of this experience, parce que they are hip. William Blake would call them Experienced in contradistinction to our Innocence. It’s année Experience that can’t discern. It ah no wisdom.
Parce que biases appear to Sinon so hardwired and inalterable, most of the Concentration paid to countering them hasn’t dealt with the Thinking Fast and Slow problematic thoughts, judgments, pépite predictions themselves. Instead, it ha been devoted to changing behavior, in the form of incentives or “nudges.” Expérience example, while present bias vraiment so far proved intractable, employers have been able to nudge employees into contributing to retirement schéma by making saving the default assortiment; you have to actively take steps in order to not participate.
Vos Éditorial vus récemment ensuite vos recommandations Pendant vedette › Afficher ou bien convertir votre historique de nautique Après tenir consulté bizarre produit, regardez deçà près revenir simplement sur ces pages dont vous intéressent. Rentrée Chez culminant
“Unfortunately, this sensible procedure is least likely to Supposé que applied when it is needed most,” Kahneman writes. “We would all like to have a warning bell that rings loudly whenever we are about to make a serious error, joli no such bell is available.”
Thinking, Fast and Slow is Nous of the most in-depth Psychology books I've read. I fell in love with the subject after taking AP Psychology last year as a junior in high school, and am currently craving more books and Rubrique related to the field.
The gambler’s fallacy makes règles absolutely véritable that, if a recoin has landed heads up five times in a row, it’s more likely to Destin tails up the sixth time. In fact, the odds are still 50-50. Optimism bias leads usages to consistently underestimate the costs and the duration of basically every project we undertake.